Thursday, December 4, 2008

Christina - First response to tasks 1 and 2

Task 1. Describe one of your lessons that went very well. For this lesson, explain what you were teaching, how you were teaching and how you knew it went well. In your description of your lesson consider the following:
a. Where did your ideas for this lesson come from?
b. How was this different from other lessons?
c. What do you think made the lesson successful?
d. Did you learn anything from the experience?
e. If you want to improve this lesson how would you do it?f. Have you shared your experience with anyone else?
One of the lessons I can remember from year 2008 is a lesson conducted quite early in the year. It was a Form 3 lesson. The subject of study was Tun Abdul Razak but I brought in elements from the USA history as well, specifically Martin Luther King, and another famous person, Nelson Mandela. How I planned the lesson was basically by looking at what we were supposed to cover. It was a lesson that was different because I decided not to focus too much on language content but on historical significance and using material that was available elsewhere (internet). I would say the lesson was successful because we moved away from convention whereby language was of the utmost importance. Instead, we looked at information on the persons as found in other media, ie. the internet. We also looked at something that WAS language-based, and that was Martin Luther King's famous speech that contained "I have a dream". We studied that part of the speech for its language content, how certain things are expressed in poetic language. The main thing I learned from the lesson (actually a series of lessons) is that we have to move away from just focusing on language content. There is a need to draw the students' interest in matters that we are supposed to teach and by focusing on other things such as historical significance (or scientific discovery, or impact of certain rock bands, even), we show that we respect the students' interests. When the students find that we share their interests, they have a new respect for our interests and the things we try to teach them.
To improve this lesson, I would probably be a lot more organised. Instead of just asking the students to look for information on Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela, I would ask them to tell me why they would want a leader like them. I would prepare more sign post questions to lead them to where I want them to be. And yes, I have shared about the lesson with a colleague who was teaching the same topic but in a different manner.

Task 2 All teachers experience challenges. Could you describe one that was very challenging. Where did your ideas for this lesson come from?
a. Where did your ideas for this lesson come from?
b. How was this different from other lessons?
c. What do you think made the lesson challenging?
d. Did you learn anything from the experience?
e. If you want to improve this lesson how would you do it?
f. Have you shared your experience with anyone else?
One of the challenges I find in teaching is trying to NOT prepare a one-size fits all kind of lesson. Come what may, our students have varying levels of proficiency and face different problems in language learning. One of the lessons I had which was challenging to implement was one on famous persons. I asked the students to get into groups of 4 and each group is given the name of a famous person (an entertainer). They were to pretend (as a group) to be that person and prepare for an interview by journalists in a press conference. The journalists are actually members from another group. So each group was interviewed as a famous person, and also became journalists. The challenge was actually to get the students to speak up. Some students did find it difficult to ask questions (esp in a polite manner), and to answer (politely). They tended to get carried away with the role-playing. I got the idea from the students themselves as they were often sharing gossips about artistes. It was challenging because I have to discover the artistes that interested them and they knew about. And it was different because the lesson was going to be all speaking and listening and no writing. I learned later that I should have included writing as an enrichment task - ie. write a short paragraph about the interview they conducted. It was a very noisy lesson and things were getting slightly out of control and I would plan my lesson a little differently so that it would be less noisy. I did share with a colleague .... and got some feedback from her.
That's about it. It has been a long response. Do comment. Thanks.

9 comments:

  1. Hi Chris,

    I should congratulate you for being the first person (among three group of teachers) to post the entry! Well done, friend! (Sorry for not sending you a sms as usual, somehow there was a technical problem - oh .. antique mobile!)

    I found it to be a pretty interesting story, especially when you noticed that your lesson went well since not all practitioners know that they have /have not reached 'there'. Okay, we will wait for others to give their response/comment to this interesting post...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Christine,

    Very interesting ideas indeed. What you are proposing is content-based language teaching. It has been found to be very effective especially if the content is of great interest to the students. Teaching language skills per se can be very dry. Anyone has done something related?

    Role play is interesting but I find that students tend to be unnatural acting as someone else .. any comments from the others? sm

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Dr Thang,
    I agree that role play can be very unnatural. My students enjoyed it, though. I find that some do a good job, while others find it a chore and boring.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Chris,
    I like your second lesson. Will try it this year. Yes, it's difficult to make them to start speaking, especially the weak ones. So, I suggest we give them a short session on warming up before the real conversation starts. Here, we can even introduce some language functions and some common expressions that they're going to use in the interview. There's one book on teaching of speaking that I found really helpful when I had to teach a MUET class two years back. I'll post the title next week as the book is at school. As for the noise, don't worry, it is not a language class if there is no noise made! Believe in that! So, bring them out from the classroom and let them make as much noise as they want to, but make sure that they're using EL. Ok, Chris, I hope you don't mind reading my comments. Please comment on mine...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for your comments, Faridah. I believe it is good when the students make lots of productive noise. Unfortunately some other teachers find it too much to stomach. Anyway, I am teaching Forms 2 and 3 this year. I hope to have more interesting lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting lessons! Students like it when we are keen on their interests. We may not focus on language but because they are interested, they are willing to use the language (especially the weak ones).Don't you agree?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is the book that I've mentioned earlier. 'Getting Ahead With English - Listening and Speaking' by Ng Keat Siew. The exercises can be used with the PPSMI teachers too.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You have come up with some great ideas to encourage the weaker students to improve their proficiency. What about the good ones? How do you keep them interested? Do they get bored in class?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Chris,

    It's okay for the class to be a 'bit' noisy as long as they are performing the task given. You mentioned that you shared your lesson with a colleague. What was his/her feedback?

    In addition, its good to know that you analyze your students' interests on certain matters in planning lessons.

    ReplyDelete